Learning strategies of dental students in Buenos Aires, Argentina prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Various theories have endeavored to explain how knowledge is accessed. Students, in order to learn, need a good repertoire of appropriate metacognitive and self-regulating strategies and knowledge, which they use consciously or unconsciously. Teachers, in addition to knowing how to teach, need to be aware of students' learning strategies, metacognition, and self-regulation, and of the impact of changes associated with recent pandemic scenarios. AIM: The aim of this study was to identify the study strategies preferred by dental students in two different scenarios: prior to and during the pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The sample consisted of third-year dentistry students at Buenos Aires University (UBA) during 2019 (Group GP, 141 students, face-toface activity) and 2021 (Group GE, 60 students, e-learning during the pandemic). Participants were asked (a) to provide demographic information (sex and age) and (b) to answer the abridged ACRA scale. Statistical treatment included descriptive tests; Chi2, binomial exact and Student's t-test (p<0.05). RESULTS: The proportion of students who participated with respect to total students enrolled was 58.50% in 2019 and 26.20% in 2021, with female gender being significantly higher. There were significant differences in total number of participants during the different periods (p=0.001), and in gender distribution during the pandemic (p=0.007). Comparison between groups GP and GE showed no significant difference regarding preferences expressed in total values for the scale or for the domains. Analysis of preferences according to gender showed significant differences in total group (p=0.007) and the domains CLCS (Cognitive and Learning Control Strategies) (p= 0.008) and LSS (Learning Support Strategies) (p=0.002). The mean values of preferences selected by females were higher. Similar results were found upon analyzing preferences during the pandemic (n= 60) considering total score (p= 0.033) and the domains CLCS (p= 0.035) and LSS (p= 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The study identified trends towards an increase in the score and consequently greater use of techniques included in the domains related to metacognition, especially among women. There is potential neutralization of the impact created by the methodological shift between the two periods (face-to-face and e-learning) probably as a result of the implicit adaptability, latent in students, regarding digital methodology, which enables them to adapt to learning in challenging situations.

Varias teorías se han esforzado por explicar cómo se accede al conocimiento. Para aprender, los estudiantes necesitan tener un conjunto de estrategias y conocimientos apropiados, y utilizarlos consciente o inconscientemente. Los docentes deben conocer las estrategias de aprendizaje, la metacognición y la autorregulación de los estudiantes, así como el impacto de los cambios asociados con los escenarios pandémicos recientes sobre esas estrategias. OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar las estrategias de estudio preferidas por los estudiantes de odontología en diferentes escenarios: previo y durante la pandemia. Materiales y Método: La muestra estuvo conformada por estudiantes de tercer año de la carrera de odontología (UBA) durante el año 2019 (Grupo GP, 141 estudiantes, actividad presencial) y 2021 (Grupo GE, 60 estudiantes, e-learning durante la pandemia). Los participantes proporcionaron información demográfica (sexo y edad) y respondieron el cuestionario ACRA abreviado. El tratamiento estadístico incluyó medidas de tendencia central, dispersión y distribución de frecuencias, prueba Chi2, binomial exacta y prueba t de Student (p<0,05). RESULTADOS: La distribución de estudiantes que participaron con respecto al total de estudiantes matriculados fue de 58,50% en 2019 y 26,20% en 2021, siendo significativamente mayor el género femenino. Hubo diferencias significativas en el número total de participantes durante los diferentes períodos (p=0,001) y en la distribución por género durante la pandemia (p=0,007). La comparación entre los grupos GP y GE no mostró diferencia significativa en cuanto a las preferencias expresadas en valores totales para la escala o para los dominios. El análisis de preferencias según género mostró diferencias significativas en: grupo total (p=0,007) y los dominios ECCA (Estrategias de Control Cognitivo y de Aprendizaje) (p= 0,008) y EAA (Estrategias de Apoyo al Aprendizaje) (p=0,002). Los valores medios de las preferencias seleccionadas por las mujeres fueron más altos. Resultados similares se encontraron al analizar las preferencias durante la pandemia (n= 60) considerando la puntuación total (p= 0,033) y los dominios ECCA (p= 0,035) y EAA (p= 0,007). CONCLUSIONES: El estudio identificó un aumento en el puntaje y consecuentemente un mayor uso de técnicas incluidas en los dominios relacionados con la metacognición, especialmente entre las mujeres. Existe una potencial neutralización del impacto creado por el cambio metodológico entre los dos períodos (presencial y e-learning) probablemente como resultado de la adaptabilidad implícita, latente en los estudiantes, respecto a la metodología digital, que les permita adaptarse al aprendizaje en situaciones desafiantes.

Dental Emergency Admissions in Emergency Oral Health Care Centers during COVID-19 Pandemic in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

This study aimed to describe patients' demographic characteristics and treatment delivered in private and public dental emergency clinics and to compare them with a pre-pandemic period. A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out on patients attending the University Dental Hospital of the University of Buenos Aires and on one private dental clinic, situated in Buenos Aires, between March and June of 2019 and 2020. The sample considered all the patients' medical records of those requiring emergency dental treatment at these centers during that period. We systematize the treatments required and delivered by the emergency providers into categories. In 2019, 36,071 patients were treated at the university dental hospital and the private clinic. In 2020, 7485 patients received emergency treatment, showing a fivefold reduction. During a pre-pandemic period, in 2019, both oral care centers provided 44,894 treatments, around three times the treatments provided in 2020 during the same period. We have found significant differences in the age groups of people who required emergency treatment in the pandemic period compared to the pre-pandemic period. During the pandemic period, the most represented types of treatment were radiographic exams (3061) and tooth extractions (2583). Conversely, during the pre-pandemic period, the most frequent treatments were radiographic examinations (16,649) and general consultations (10,591). The percentages of all types of treatments differ significantly between the two years except for pediatric consultations and prosthetics emergencies. As the pandemic is still an ongoing sanitary problem, urgent dental care patterns should be considered.

Corrigendum to "Assesment of SARS-CoV-2 infection-in dentists and supporting staff at a university dental hospital in Argentina". Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research Volume 11, Issue 2 (2021) Pages 169-173.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.01.006.].

CariesCare International adapted for the pandemic in children: Caries OUT multicentre single-group interventional study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive caries care has shown effectiveness in controlling caries progression and improving health outcomes by controlling caries risk, preventing initial-caries lesions progression, and patient satisfaction. To date, the caries-progression control effectiveness of the patient-centred risk-based CariesCare International (CCI) system, derived from ICCMS™ for the practice (2019), remains unproven. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic a previously planned multi-centre RCT shifted to this "Caries OUT" study, aiming to assess in a single-intervention group in children, the caries-control effectiveness of CCI adapted for the pandemic with non-aerosols generating procedures (non-AGP) and reducing in-office time. METHODS: In this 1-year multi-centre single-group interventional trial the adapted-CCI effectiveness will be assessed in one single group in terms of tooth-surface level caries progression control, and secondarily, individual-level caries progression control, children's oral-health behaviour change, parents' and dentists' process acceptability, and costs exploration. A sample size of 258 3-5 and 6-8 years old patients was calculated after removing half from the previous RCT, allowing for a 25% dropout, including generally health children (27 per centre). The single-group intervention will be the adapted-CCI 4D-cycle caries care, with non-AGP and reduced in-office appointments' time. A trained examiner per centre will conduct examinations at baseline, at 5-5.5 months (3 months after basic management), 8.5 and 12 months, assessing the child's CCI caries risk and oral-health behaviour, visually staging and assessing caries-lesions severity and activity without air-drying (ICDAS-merged Epi); fillings/sealants; missing/dental-sepsis teeth, and tooth symptoms, synthetizing together with parent and external-trained dental practitioner (DP) the patient- and tooth-surface level diagnoses and personalised care plan. DP will deliver the adapted-CCI caries care. Parents' and dentists' process acceptability will be assessed via Treatment-Evaluation-Inventory questionnaires, and costs in terms of number of appointments and activities. Twenty-one centres in 13 countries will participate. DISCUSSION: The results of Caries OUT adapted for the pandemic will provide clinical data that could help support shifting the caries care in children towards individualised oral-health behaviour improvement and tooth-preserving care, improving health outcomes, and explore if the caries progression can be controlled during the pandemic by conducting non-AGP and reducing in-office time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively-registered-ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT04666597-07/12/2020: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S000AGM4&selectaction=Edit&uid=U00019IE&ts=2&cx=uwje3h . Protocol-version 2: 27/01/2021.